|
Posted on
July 25, 2010
by
Jeremy Zawodny
Following up on yesterday’s 200,000,000 Keys in Redis 2.0.0-rc3
post, which was a worst-case test scenario to see what the overhead for
top-level keys in Redis is, I decided to push the boundaries in a
different way. I wanted to use the new Hash data type to see if I could
store over 1 billion values on a single 32GB box. To do that, I modified
my previous script to create 25,000,000 top-level hashes, each of which
had 50 key/value pairs in it.
The code for redisStressHash
was this:
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
$|++;
use strict;
use lib 'perl-Redis/lib';
use Redis;
my $r = Redis->new(server => 'localhost:63790') or die "$!";
## 2.5B values
for my $key (1..25_000_000) {
my @vals;
for my $k (1..50) {
my $v = int(rand($key));
push @vals, $k, $v;
}
$r->hmset("$key", @vals) or die "$!";
}
exit;
__END__
Note that I added a use lib
in there to use a modified Redis Perl library that speaks the multi-bulk protocol used all over in the Redis 2.0 series.
If you do the math, that yields 1.25 billion (1,250,000,000)
key/value pairs stored. This time I remembered to time the execution as
well:
real160m17.479s
user58m55.577s
sys5m53.178s
So it took about 2 hours and 40 minutes to complete. The resulting
dump file (.rdb file) was 13GB in size (compared to the previous 1.8GB)
and the memory usage was roughly 17GB.
Here’s the INFO output again on the master:
redis_version:1.3.16
redis_git_sha1:00000000
redis_git_dirty:0
arch_bits:64
multiplexing_api:epoll
process_id:21426
uptime_in_seconds:12807
uptime_in_days:0
connected_clients:1
connected_slaves:1
blocked_clients:0
used_memory:18345759448
used_memory_human:17.09G
changes_since_last_save:774247
bgsave_in_progress:1
last_save_time:1280092860
bgrewriteaof_in_progress:0
total_connections_received:22
total_commands_processed:32937310
expired_keys:0
hash_max_zipmap_entries:64
hash_max_zipmap_value:512
pubsub_channels:0
pubsub_patterns:0
vm_enabled:0
role:master
db0:keys=25000000,expires=0
Not bad, really. This provides a slightly more reasonable usse case
of storing many values in Redis. In most applications, I supsect people
will have a number of “complex” values stored behind their top-level
keys (unlike my previous simple test).
I’m kind of tempted to re-run this test using LISTS, then SETS, then
SORTED SETS just to see how they all compare from a storage point of
view.
In any case, a 10 machine cluster could handle 12 billion key/value pairs this way. Food for thought.
Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)
Ads by Google
[size=1.2em]新君越 创变格局的高级轿车
智能直喷V6发动机+6速手自一体变速器 CDC稳定系统,让动力与操控完美共生.
lacrosse.buick.com.cn/
[size=1.2em]Golden-Key Precision
specializes in the manufacture of blank keys, color key. OEM and ODM
www.golden-key.com.tw
[size=1.2em]Silvia / 240SX Key Blanks
JDM Logo Shaped Key Blanks K's Logo, Silvia Logo, 5 Colors
www.Rotary13B1.com/Silvia_Key_Blank
[size=1.2em]点评团杭州站-大众点评官网
适合白领的高品质团购网站 15天内退款,有保障,可信赖!
t.dianping.com |
|