设为首页 收藏本站
查看: 627|回复: 0

[经验分享] Oracle-07445[kgghash]:Oracle BUG导致更新LOB字段时进程被KILL掉

[复制链接]

尚未签到

发表于 2016-7-27 01:05:20 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
Oracle-07445[kgghash]:Oracle BUG导致更新LOB字段时进程被KILL掉

现象:
用户反馈有DB连接被意外KILL掉的情况,排查中发现alert日志中有如下信息:
Mon Apr 22 14:49:58 2013
Exception [type: SIGSEGV, Address not mapped to object] [ADDR:0x2B1733615000] [PC:0x777EE03, kgghash()+367]
Errors in file /oracle/app/11gR1/diag/rdbms/portal/portal2/trace/portal2_ora_19188.trc (incident=186505):
ORA-07445: 出现异常错误: 核心转储 [kgghash()+367] [SIGSEGV] [ADDR:0x2B1733615000] [PC:0x777EE03] [Address not mapped to object] [] <<<<<<<<<
Incident details in: /oracle/app/11gR1/diag/rdbms/portal/portal2/incident/incdir_186505/portal2_ora_19188_i186505.trc
Mon Apr 22 14:55:08 2013
Thread 2 advanced to log sequence 4042
Current log# 12 seq# 4042 mem# 0: +portalDG/portal/onlinelog/group_12.292.796513605
Mon Apr 22 14:55:08 2013
SUCCESS: diskgroup ARCHDG was mounted
Mon Apr 22 14:55:14 2013
SUCCESS: diskgroup ARCHDG was dismounted
Mon Apr 22 15:00:01 2013
Process 0x0x2147ed628 appears to be hung while dumping <===进程被KILL掉
Current time = 1955749344, process death time = 1955689185 interval = 60000
Attempting to kill process 0x0x2147ed628 with OS pid = 19188
OSD kill succeeded for process 0x2147ed628
同时段的alert日志中确实有KILL process信息,并且在process被KILL前,该进程有ORA-07445错误报出,估计是Oracle的BUG。
查看portal2_ora_19188_i186505.trc日志信息:

Dump file /oracle/app/11gR1/diag/rdbms/portal/portal2/incident/incdir_186505/portal2_ora_19188_i186505.trc
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.6.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, Real Application Clusters, OLAP, Data Mining
and Real Application Testing options
ORACLE_HOME = /oracle/app/11gR1/db
System name: Linux
Node name: PORTAL02
Release: 2.6.18-194.el5
Version: #1 SMP Tue Mar 16 21:52:39 EDT 2010
Machine: x86_64
Instance name: portal2
Redo thread mounted by this instance: 2
Oracle process number: 213
Unix process pid: 19188, image: oracle@PORTAL02


*** 2013-04-22 14:49:58.322
*** SESSION ID:(1403.45735) 2013-04-22 14:49:58.322
*** CLIENT ID:() 2013-04-22 14:49:58.322
*** SERVICE NAME:(portal) 2013-04-22 14:49:58.322
*** MODULE NAME:(JDBC Thin Client) 2013-04-22 14:49:58.322
*** ACTION NAME:() 2013-04-22 14:49:58.322

Dump continued from file: /oracle/app/11gR1/diag/rdbms/portal/portal2/trace/portal2_ora_19188.trc
ORA-07445: 出现异常错误: 核心转储 [kgghash()+367] [SIGSEGV] [ADDR:0x2B1733615000] [PC:0x777EE03] [Address not mapped to object] []

========= Dump for incident 186505 (ORA 7445 [kgghash()+367]) ========
----- Beginning of Customized Incident Dump(s) -----
Exception [type: SIGSEGV, Address not mapped to object] [ADDR:0x2B1733615000] [PC:0x777EE03, kgghash()+367]
Registers:
%rax: 0x000000001605399e %rbx: 0x0000000000000000 %rcx: 0x000000009df422ed
%rdx: 0x00000000895e2309 %rdi: 0x00002b1733615000 %rsi: 0x00000000096d62a0
%rsp: 0x00007fffb42e8a20 %rbp: 0x00007fffb42e8a30 %r8: 0x0000000000000000
%r9: 0x00000000c55f2e0a %r10: 0x000000000777ee03 %r11: 0x000000002eeb4000
%r12: 0x0000000219382310 %r13: 0x0000000125d120e0 %r14: 0x00002b1733541e50
%r15: 0x0000000160c68fd0 %rip: 0x000000000777ee03 %efl: 0x0000000000010293
kgghash()+356 (0x777edf8) movzbl 0xa(%rdi),%esi
kgghash()+360 (0x777edfc) shl $0x10,%esi
kgghash()+363 (0x777edff) add %esi,%eax
kgghash()+365 (0x777ee01) jmp 0x777edb7
> kgghash()+367 (0x777ee03) movzbl (%rdi),%esi
kgghash()+370 (0x777ee06) add %esi,%edx
kgghash()+372 (0x777ee08) jmp 0x777ed19
kgghash()+377 (0x777ee0d) add (%rdi),%edx
kgghash()+379 (0x777ee0f) add 0x4(%rdi),%ecx

*** 2013-04-22 14:49:58.339
----- Current SQL Statement for this session (sql_id=bb8bnr20h93mk) -----
update oa9.sys_process set fd_detail=:1 , fd_descriptor=:2 where fd_id=:3

----- Call Stack Trace -----
skdstdst <- ksedst1 <- ksedst <- dbkedDefDump <- ksedmp
<- ssexhd <- restore_rt <- kgghash <- kkocsCreateBindSet <- kkocsInitAdaptiveCtx
<- apadrv <- opitca <- PGOSF385_kksFullTypeCheck <- rpiswu2 <- kksSetBindType
<- kksfbc <- opiexe <- kpoal8 <- opiodr <- ttcpip
<- opitsk <- opiino <- opiodr <- opidrv <- sou2o
<- opimai_real <- ssthrdmain <- main <- libc_start_main <- start

----------------------------------------
Cursor#35(0x2b1732bb2c28) state=BOUND curiob=0x2b1733541e50
curflg=4c fl2=0 par=(nil) ses=0x214cd7880
----- Dump Cursor sql_id=bb8bnr20h93mk xsc=0x2b1733541e50 cur=0x2b1732bb2c28 -----
Dump Parent Cursor sql_id=bb8bnr20h93mk phd=0x21b32bee8 plk=0x21a12acb8
sqltxt(0x21b32bee8)=update oa9.sys_process set fd_detail=:1 , fd_descriptor=:2 where fd_id=:3
hash=d464c012671d8361b5a174b881048e72
parent=0x1e7cda730 maxchild=01 plk=0x21a12acb8 ppn=n
cursor instantiation=0x2b1733541e50 used=1366613397 exec_id=0 exec=0
child#0(0x218b3bb40) pcs=0x1a2dff738
clk=0x21ac20ed8 ci=0x1e737a828 pn=0x21bd41568 ctx=0x125d120e0
kgsccflg=0 llk[0x2b1733541e58,0x2b1733541e58] idx=0
xscflg=130672 fl2=11100008 fl3=2222600 fl4=100
----- Bind Byte Code (IN) -----
Opcode = 14 Bind Skip Long
Opcode = 2 Bind Twotask Scalar Sql In (may be out) Copy
oacdef = 0x1a3438220 Offsi = 48, Offsi = 32
Opcode = 2 Bind Twotask Scalar Sql In (may be out) Copy
oacdef = 0x1a3438250 Offsi = 48, Offsi = 64
Opcode = 1 Unoptimized
Null Offset
----- Bind Info (kkscoacd) -----
Bind#0
oacdty=01 mxl=4001(5018) mxlc=00 mal=00 scl=00 pre=00
oacflg=03 fl2=1000010 frm=01 csi=852 siz=4000 off=0
kxsbbbfp=2b1733614060 bln=4000 avl=4001 flg=25
value=" WZ3+"...
Bind#1
oacdty=01 mxl=2000(1620) mxlc=00 mal=00 scl=00 pre=00
oacflg=03 fl2=1000010 frm=01 csi=852 siz=2128 off=0
kxsbbbfp=2b17336137d0 bln=2000 avl=822 flg=05
value="<process parent="oa">
<initial-node id="N1" name="开始" nextTargetNodeIds="N2" parent="oaInitNode">
<results>
<result priority="0" target="N2"/>
</results>
</initial-node>
<nodes>
<node id="N2" name="提交" nextTargetNodeIds="N4" parent="oaDraftNode">
<res"...
Bind#2
oacdty=01 mxl=128(64) mxlc=00 mal=00 scl=00 pre=00
oacflg=03 fl2=1000010 frm=01 csi=852 siz=0 off=2000
kxsbbbfp=2b1733613fa0 bln=128 avl=32 flg=01
value="13e3064a34e8924d0e196e044089dff5"
Frames pfr (nil) siz=0 efr (nil) siz=0
Cursor frame dump
enxt: 2.0x00000060 enxt: 1.0x00000898
pnxt: 1.0x00000060
kxscphp=0x2b1733606828 siz=1008 inu=176 nps=96
kxscbhp=0x2b17335a5660 siz=11456 inu=10696 nps=10512

分析:
ORA-07445通常是ORACLE的BUG引起的,在文档ORA-7445 [kgghash] [ID 310172.1]中发现有符合我们现象的BUG:
Bug 13463131 Dump (kgghash) from bind peeking,BUG 13463131的完整内容:
Bind peeking may dump in kgghash() when long character datatypes are
being used.
The stack will typically include the following calls:
kkocsCreateBindSet->kgghash
<===== 与我们的CASE相符合,表 oa9.sys_process有CLOB字段,且在我们的CASE中是call stack为kgghash <- kkocsCreateBindSet <- kkocsInitAdaptiveCtx

The bind variable that causes the dump shows the avl value is greater than
the bln (in the cursor dump in the trace).

Bind#7
oacdty=96 mxl=4001(22518) mxlc=00 mal=00 scl=00 pre=00
oacflg=01 fl2=1000010 frm=01 csi=873 siz=4000 off=0
kxsbbbfp=0e42f060 bln=4000 avl=4001 flg=25

This situation can happen, for example, using a CLOB column and having
the client bind with CHAR.
<====抽取我们的dump文件相关内容,可以发现bln=4000 avl=4001,符合文档描述。
Bind#0
oacdty=01 mxl=4001(5018) mxlc=00 mal=00 scl=00 pre=00
oacflg=03 fl2=1000010 frm=01 csi=852 siz=4000 off=0
kxsbbbfp=2b1733614060 bln=4000 avl=4001 flg=25 <<<<<<
value=" WZ3+"...
========================================
Workaround
Disable bind peeking (set "_optim_peek_user_binds" = false)
but note that this may cause changes to execution plans so
may not be practical.
<=====Oracle给出的解决方案是禁用bind peeking,但是带来的风险是可能导致SQL执行计划改变
另外可以升级至11.2.0.3之后再apply patch 13463131解决。
Note: This fix supersedes fixes of bug 7352414 , bug 8763922.



What is "Bind Peeking" ?

With 9i, a new feature "Bind Peeking" was introduced to try to get around the issues associated with the selectivity of a bind variable.
During hard parsing of a query using bind variables, the binds are "peeked at" and selectivity is generated based on the bind and the underlying column statistics.
This method is successful but if the bind selectivity of the initial execution of a statement varied from the selectivity of subsequent executions with different sets of binds this could sometimes lead to plans being enerated that were not representative ofthe general query usage and which performed poorly.

This feather is controlled by the hidden parameter "_OPTIM_PEEK_USER_BINDS". the default value is 'true'.

Peeking is enabled if all of the following conditions are met:
* - optimizer_features_enabled is greater than 8.2
* - there are user binds
* - the cursor is fully bound
* - the cursor is not remote mapped
* - the client is using V8OCI
* - it's a select or DML
* - peeking is possible for this statement and the statement is being
* loaded for the first time, or the original cursor was peeked and
* this cursor is being reloaded

For more details, please refer to:

Document 387394.1 Query using Bind Variables is suddenly slow
Document 430208.1 Bind Peeking By Example
"_OPTIM_PEEK_USER_BINDS" [Hidden] Reference Note [ID 201672.1]

运维网声明 1、欢迎大家加入本站运维交流群:群②:261659950 群⑤:202807635 群⑦870801961 群⑧679858003
2、本站所有主题由该帖子作者发表,该帖子作者与运维网享有帖子相关版权
3、所有作品的著作权均归原作者享有,请您和我们一样尊重他人的著作权等合法权益。如果您对作品感到满意,请购买正版
4、禁止制作、复制、发布和传播具有反动、淫秽、色情、暴力、凶杀等内容的信息,一经发现立即删除。若您因此触犯法律,一切后果自负,我们对此不承担任何责任
5、所有资源均系网友上传或者通过网络收集,我们仅提供一个展示、介绍、观摩学习的平台,我们不对其内容的准确性、可靠性、正当性、安全性、合法性等负责,亦不承担任何法律责任
6、所有作品仅供您个人学习、研究或欣赏,不得用于商业或者其他用途,否则,一切后果均由您自己承担,我们对此不承担任何法律责任
7、如涉及侵犯版权等问题,请您及时通知我们,我们将立即采取措施予以解决
8、联系人Email:admin@iyunv.com 网址:www.yunweiku.com

所有资源均系网友上传或者通过网络收集,我们仅提供一个展示、介绍、观摩学习的平台,我们不对其承担任何法律责任,如涉及侵犯版权等问题,请您及时通知我们,我们将立即处理,联系人Email:kefu@iyunv.com,QQ:1061981298 本贴地址:https://www.yunweiku.com/thread-249780-1-1.html 上篇帖子: Oracle Err "listener does not currently know of SID given in connect descriptor" 下篇帖子: 在oracle中处理日期大全
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

扫码加入运维网微信交流群X

扫码加入运维网微信交流群

扫描二维码加入运维网微信交流群,最新一手资源尽在官方微信交流群!快快加入我们吧...

扫描微信二维码查看详情

客服E-mail:kefu@iyunv.com 客服QQ:1061981298


QQ群⑦:运维网交流群⑦ QQ群⑧:运维网交流群⑧ k8s群:运维网kubernetes交流群


提醒:禁止发布任何违反国家法律、法规的言论与图片等内容;本站内容均来自个人观点与网络等信息,非本站认同之观点.


本站大部分资源是网友从网上搜集分享而来,其版权均归原作者及其网站所有,我们尊重他人的合法权益,如有内容侵犯您的合法权益,请及时与我们联系进行核实删除!



合作伙伴: 青云cloud

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表