LXC和Docker的关系

o_哈哈o

Docker is not a replacement for lxc. "lxc" refers to capabilities of the linux kernel (specifically namespaces and control groups) which allow sandboxing processes from one another, and controlling their resource allocations.
On top of this low-level foundation of kernel features, Docker offers a high-level tool with several powerful functionalities:

• Portable deployment across machines. Docker defines a format for bundling an application and all its dependencies into a single object which can be transferred to any docker-enabled machine, and executed there with the guarantee that the execution environmentexposed to the application will be the same. Lxc implements process sandboxing, which is an important pre-requisite for portable deployment, but that alone is not enough for portable deployment. If you sent me a copy of your application installed in a customlxc configuration, it would almost certainly not run on my machine the way it does on yours, because it is tied to your machine's specific configuration: networking, storage, logging, distro, etc. Docker defines an abstraction for these machine-specific settings,so that the exact same docker container can run - unchanged - on many different machines, with many different configurations.
  
• Application-centric. Docker is optimized for the deployment of applications,as opposed to machines. This is reflected in its API, user interface, design philosophy and documentation. By contrast, the lxc helper scripts focus on containers as lightweight machines - basically servers that boot faster and need less ram. We think there'smore to containers than just that.
  
• Automatic build. Docker includes a tool for developers to automatically assemble a container from their source code, with full control over applicationdependencies, build tools, packaging etc. They are free to use make, maven, chef, puppet, salt, debian packages, rpms, source tarballs, or any combination of the above, regardlessof the configuration of the machines.
  
• Versioning. Docker includes git-like capabilities for tracking successive versions of a container, inspecting the diff between versions, committingnew versions, rolling back etc. The history also includes how a container was assembled and by whom, so you get full traceability from the productionserver all the way back to the upstream developer. Docker also implements incremental uploads and downloads, similar to "git pull", so new versions of a container can be transferred by only sending diffs.
  
• Component re-use. Any container can be used as an "base image" to create more specialized components. This can be done manually or as part of anautomated build. For example you can prepare the ideal python environment, and use it as a base for 10 different applications. Your ideal postgresql setup can be re-used for all your future projects. And so on.
  
• Sharing. Docker has access to a public registry (http://index.docker.io)where thousands of people have uploaded useful containers: anything from redis, couchdb, postgres to irc bouncers to rails app servers to hadoop to base images for various distros. The registry also includes an official "standard library" of useful containersmaintained by the docker team. The registry itself is open-source, so anyone can deploy their own registry to store and transfer private containers, for internal server deployments for example.
  
• Tool ecosystem. Docker defines an API for automating and customizing the creation and deployment of containers. There are a huge number of toolsintegrating with docker to extend its capabilities. PaaS-like deployment (Dokku, Deis, Flynn), multi-node orchestration (maestro, salt, mesos, openstack nova), management dashboards (docker-ui, openstack horizon, shipyard), configuration management (chef,puppet), continuous integration (jenkins, strider, travis), etc. Docker is rapidly establishing itself as the standard for container-based tooling.
  

I hope this helps!