设为首页 收藏本站
查看: 1113|回复: 0

[经验分享] mongodb压缩——snappy、zlib块压缩,btree索引前缀压缩

[复制链接]

尚未签到

发表于 2017-12-16 13:45:28 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
MongoDB 3.0 WiredTiger Compression and Performance

  One of the most exciting developments over the lifetime of MongoDB must be the inclusion of the WiredTiger storage engine in MongoDB 3.0. Its very design and core architecture are legions ahead of the current MMAPv1 engine and comparable to most modern day storage engines for various>
Configuration
  MongoDB 3.0 allows the user to configure different storage engines through the storage engine API. For the first time ever we have an amazing array of options for setting up MongoDB to match our workloads and use-cases. To run WiredTiger the version must be 3.0 or higher and the configuration file must call for WiredTiger. For example:
  

storage:  dbPath: "/data/mongodb"
  journal:
  enabled: true
  engine: "wiredTiger"
  wiredTiger:
  engineConfig:
  cacheSizeGB: 99
  journalCompressor: none
  directoryForIndexes: "/indexes/mongodb/"
  collectionConfig:
  blockCompressor: snappy
  indexConfig:
  prefixCompression: true
  
systemLog:
  destination: file
  path: "/tmp/mongodb.log"
  logAppend: true
  
processManagement:
  fork: true
  
net:
  port: 9005
  unixDomainSocket:
  enabled : true
  

  

  There are a lot of new configuration options in 3.0 so let's take the notable options one by one.


  •   storage.engine. The setting ensures we are using the WiredTiger storage engine. Should be set to "wiredTiger" to use the WiredTiger engine. It can also be set to "mmapv1". MMAPv1 is the default in 3.0, but in MongoDB 3.1 (potentially) this will change to wiredTiger.

  •   storage.wiredTiger.engineConfig.cacheSizeGB. This sets up a page cache for WiredTiger to cache frequently used data and index blocks in GB. If this is not specified, MongoDB will automatically assign memory up to about 50% of total addressable memory.


  •   storage.wiredTiger.engineConfig.directoryForIndexes. Yes! We can now store indexes on a separate block device. This should help DBAs>
  •   storage.wiredTiger.collectionConfig.blockCompressor. This can be set to 'snappy' or 'zlib'. Snappy having higher performance and lower compression than zlib. Some more detail later on compression algorithms.

  •   storage.wiredTiger.indexConfig.prefixCompression. This setting enables prefix compression for indexes. Valid options are true|false and the default is true.

Let's talk performance
  WiredTiger is going to be much faster than MMAPv1 for almost all workloads. Its real sweet spot is highly concurrent and/or workloads with lots of updates. This may surprise some folks because traditionally compression is a trade off. Add compression, lose performance. That is normally true, but a couple of things need to be considered here. One, we are comparing the MMAPv1 engine with database level locking to WiredTiger with document level locking. Any reasonable concurrent workload is almost always bound by locking and seldom by pure system level resources. Two, WiredTiger does page level compression. More on this later.
  There are a few things that make WiredTiger faster other than its locking scope. WiredTiger also has a streamlined process for free space lookups and management and it has a proper cache with its own I/O components.
  Because WiredTiger allows for compression, a common worry is the potential for overall performance impact. But as you can see, in a practical sense this worry is mostly unfounded.

  A couple graphs for>
DSC0000.png

  Let's break it down a bit more:
DSC0001.png


  The>
DSC0002.png


Let's talk more about compression
  Compressing data inside a database is tricky. WiredTiger does a great job at handling compression because of its sophisticated management approach:

  The cache generally stores uncompressed changes (the exception is for very large documents). The default snappy compression is fairly straightforward: it gathers data up to a maximum of 32KB, compresses it, and if compression is successful, writes the block rounded up to the nearest 4KB.

  The>  —Michael Cahill

  This approach is great for performance. But compression still has overhead and can vary in effectiveness. What this means for users is two-fold:


  • Not all data sets compress equally, it depends on the data format itself.
  • Data compression is temporal. One day being better than another depending on the specific workload.
  One approach is to take a mongodump of the dataset in question then mongorestore that data to a compressed WiredTiger database and measure the difference. This gives a rough measurement of what one can expect the compression ratio to be. That said, as soon as the new compressed database starts taking load, that compression ratio may vary. Probably not by a massive margin however.
  It should be noted there are some tricky bits to consider when running a database using compression. Because WiredTiger compresses each page before it hits the disk the memory region is uncompressed. This means that highly compressed data will have a large ratio between its footprint on disk and the cache that serves it. Poorly compressed data the opposite. The effect may be the database becomes slow. It will be hard to know that the problem is the caching pattern has changed because the compression properties of the underlaying data have changed. Keeping good time series data on the cache utilization, and periodically checking the compression of the data by hand may help the DBA understand these patterns better.
  For instance, note the different compression ratios of various datasets:
DSC0003.png


Take Aways


  • MongoDB 3.0 has a new storage engine API, and is delivered with the optional WiredTiger engine.
  • MongoDB 3.0 with WiredTiger is much faster than MMAPv1 mostly because of increased concurrency.
  • MongoDB 3.0 with WiredTiger is much faster than MMAPv1 even when compressing the data.
  Lastly, remember, MongoDB 3.0 is a new piece of software. Test before moving production workloads to it. TEST TEST TEST.
  If you would like to test MongoDB 3.0 with WiredTiger, ObjectRocket has it as generally available and it's simple and quick to setup. As with anything ObjectRocket, there are a team of DBAs and Developers to help you with your projects. Don't be shy hitting them up at support@objectrocket.com with questions or email me directly.
  Note: test configuration and details documented here.

运维网声明 1、欢迎大家加入本站运维交流群:群②:261659950 群⑤:202807635 群⑦870801961 群⑧679858003
2、本站所有主题由该帖子作者发表,该帖子作者与运维网享有帖子相关版权
3、所有作品的著作权均归原作者享有,请您和我们一样尊重他人的著作权等合法权益。如果您对作品感到满意,请购买正版
4、禁止制作、复制、发布和传播具有反动、淫秽、色情、暴力、凶杀等内容的信息,一经发现立即删除。若您因此触犯法律,一切后果自负,我们对此不承担任何责任
5、所有资源均系网友上传或者通过网络收集,我们仅提供一个展示、介绍、观摩学习的平台,我们不对其内容的准确性、可靠性、正当性、安全性、合法性等负责,亦不承担任何法律责任
6、所有作品仅供您个人学习、研究或欣赏,不得用于商业或者其他用途,否则,一切后果均由您自己承担,我们对此不承担任何法律责任
7、如涉及侵犯版权等问题,请您及时通知我们,我们将立即采取措施予以解决
8、联系人Email:admin@iyunv.com 网址:www.yunweiku.com

所有资源均系网友上传或者通过网络收集,我们仅提供一个展示、介绍、观摩学习的平台,我们不对其承担任何法律责任,如涉及侵犯版权等问题,请您及时通知我们,我们将立即处理,联系人Email:kefu@iyunv.com,QQ:1061981298 本贴地址:https://www.yunweiku.com/thread-424708-1-1.html 上篇帖子: 在Spring MVC框架下利用RESTful API和MongoDB实现用户留言与邮件反馈 下篇帖子: windows7下MongoDB(V3.4)的使用及仓储设计
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

扫码加入运维网微信交流群X

扫码加入运维网微信交流群

扫描二维码加入运维网微信交流群,最新一手资源尽在官方微信交流群!快快加入我们吧...

扫描微信二维码查看详情

客服E-mail:kefu@iyunv.com 客服QQ:1061981298


QQ群⑦:运维网交流群⑦ QQ群⑧:运维网交流群⑧ k8s群:运维网kubernetes交流群


提醒:禁止发布任何违反国家法律、法规的言论与图片等内容;本站内容均来自个人观点与网络等信息,非本站认同之观点.


本站大部分资源是网友从网上搜集分享而来,其版权均归原作者及其网站所有,我们尊重他人的合法权益,如有内容侵犯您的合法权益,请及时与我们联系进行核实删除!



合作伙伴: 青云cloud

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表